Digital Technology

First Indian historian: Notorious or ignorant More than a hundred years, when history is written of India under British influence, there was no room for Ramayan and Mahabharat as historical events. They were epic and no meaning for students. It is surprising that India is a country whose history by his enemies and the whole nation that follows was written more. Without doubt, the story was a strategic attack on the Indian civilization and culture, which paved the way for Western culture in the country. In time the truth is coming back. Science of India, which has now adopted is rejected by Western influence. Myths are suddenly appear in history. And such a story is Ram Sethu. As a history of Hindus, politics and literature are not willing to accept as truth. If they are so smart, we go beyond this article. I challenge him with some questions in bold mentioned in this article. Leave us a background of what politicians say and historian (written in British literary history) on the Ram Sethu. Historian BD Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru University says the archaeological record says nothing of the sort. There is no evidence of human presence on the subcontinent, he said, about 250000-300000 years. It is generally accepted hominid ancestors husband not to leave their countries in Africa, about two million years. Very important point here is that Mr. Chatterjee has forgotten to note that what is said of hominid ancestors, is also a belief – a belief by the people of the West and followed by Mr. Chatterjee – not the truth, Science. Ramayan course, if faith is a faith of the people of East Indian people -. Mr Chattopadhyay tried to introduce a shock worldview. Why Mr Chattopadhyay challenge a real example of a false belief? To Mr. Chattopadhyay want to say that Lord Rama is deep in the heart of billions of Indians at this time without truth? Can not find false beliefs, such as deep roots in society and for so long? I read a similar comment N Ramanujam. Head of the Graduate Department of Geology and Research Centre, VO Chidambaram College, Tuticorin. He said that Adam’s Bridge is a chain of shoals between the Palk Straits and Gulf of Mannar, created by sedimentation through a long shore currents. The explanation of the geological history of the bridge, he said both the Palk Strait and the GOM were once part of the Cauvery basin in the separation of India and Antarctica about 70 million years during the period of Gondwana has been created. “ They were together until a peak in the region formed by the thinning of the crust. The development of this ridge augmented the coral in the region. ”The coral, acted as” Sand Trapper led to the formation of Rameswaram cover Iceland, said Dr. Ramanujam. The long shore currents on the south side of the island has a coastline east of Dhanuskodi discontinuous Talaimannar, Adam’s Bridge. Let’s see what Mr. Ramanujam said: How many channels as bridging the two nations Shoals Dr. Ramanujam is known? Are there any build other geographic regions around the world – do not say that the deposits of banks along the coast, there are two land bridges? Mr. Ramanujam also notes the support of another faith, to beat the truth. It is the theory of Gondwana speaking, a theory without any concrete – has an argument with an imaginary scientific logic behind it. Hundreds of such a theory can be created on the current principles, but that does not challenge particular reason for existence. Why do you have a theory of Gondwana only a single lane bridge in the world? Very important – Ramanujam is unable to recommend the names of both places and Dhanuskodi Talaimannar, non-English names, as they already exist, and can be successfully modified a controversial English name Adam’s Bridge Setu instead of RAM. Mr. Ramanujam could very easily put his theory with the name of the bridge as Ram Setu. But he finds himself in the word that Adam’s Bridge – WHY? Why Mr. Ramanujam has accepted the theory of Adam to be correct? To Mr. Ramanujam want to argue that Adam and Eve were not there and Rama? If yes, then Adam and Eve were alone in India, the bridge is in India – Another controversy – like Manu Shatrupa be more familiar names in this region and the analogy to Adam and Eve. In addition, the acquisition of Adam’s bridge is assuming it was built by Adam. In fact, matches against the logic – how the first man to build a bridge in the world that the band? It would be immature in the first place, he is alone in second place and why he will always strive to maintain the pier? Although the only evidence is with India, no logic inscribed the name “Adam’s Bridge”. This clearly reflects the mentality of trying to impose Christian and Hindu killed size. And the poor historian of India, raised in the teaching of English, do not break the line of false pride of high literary seems powerless to say that Ram Setu Bandh is not historical. They can not even organize a small vision that people construct the wall the length of the Great Wall of China, who have seen the satellite itself, it would prevent people to build Ram Setu Bandh and what is surprising or cons that it is built as part of the Ramayana as a story. To Mr. Ramanujam want to say that when Adam built, is history, but when he builds Lord Rama is a myth and a natural concept? Professor Dupey said that the archaeological remains found, according to survey the disputed site at Ayodhya temple is the remains of which age are more than 600 in British Columbia Mr. Dubey: Would you say that if I build a temple today, you will notice that Lord Rama existed for today and not before? The temples are built and rebuilt, and their age can not be older than the temple and the age of the person whose cult ready to say the temple. We need to understand a few points here, the archeology and modern science is very different from what existed in ancient India. For example, the ancient temples of India, which still exist, were on a different technology than what we see built in the modern civil engineering. This does not mean that the archeology of the ancient world was not ready to mathematics – in fact, if we look at temples in India, Puri Jagannath Temple, for example, we can not find iron or columns used to build the temple – but it is hundreds of years to a height of 200 ft. Suppose Puri temple would have been about 10,000 years burned to the ground, which would be the technology or archaeological evidence to deduce the conclusion that the temple was 200 meters high? Similarly, the Ram Setu bandh never seen anything more, and not on earth, but in the sea – a troubled sea. The great mass of thought is already washed – a question that remains is just the way the real bridge – not the whole bridge as it was. Ramayana mentions that the bridge has been built on the sea water, with support from the sea – which means that this did not imply support for archeology in the bridge – which is easily handled by the failure of the archeology of these structures under the ground floor track. But see the presence of shoals below deck and nature, they are not in the sea, in the way they are recorded Ram Sethu. Well, Mr. Dubey admitted that age in the shallows Ram Sethu is about one million years. He misled the man as he wrote a literary history of the British, who Ramayan first 10,000 years and not 1 million years wrote. Mr. Dubey, here is a simple calculation for you to continue the investigation: The age of the bridge amounts by scientific dating of about 1 million years. According to Hindu scriptures, Ramayan took place in ‘Treta Yug’. Calculation of the Hindu scriptures (Treta Yug for a term of years, 12,96,000 Dwapara Yug an eight, 64,000 years, Kali Yug just seen, 5000 years) to know that we who was Treta Yug Yug Dwapara before. Well, one thing is clear. The bridge was built at least 8,64,000 years,, 0 86 million years old, which is quite close to one million years. Treta Yuga itself is first 3 million years. What is the scientific age of the masses and ages of the Hindu calendar Rama is exactly? Does Mr. Dubey and other historians dare attempt to come from the falsity of our enemies and lessons to explore some of the mathematics of the Hindus, before saying such a stupid comparison of the scientific age? The second analysis of the Valmiki Ramayana RAM Sethu Now let us go to the Valmiki Ramayana and deepening the story of it. Let us make sure that if we dig the story, we Ramayan Valmiki Ramayana touch alone and no other, because all the other writings in order to promote Ramayana Ramayana and the recording of the event. Here are some points of Valmiki Ramayana be considered: First laid There is no other book Ramayana, as recorded in geographical texts as constructions. 2nd Ramayan says that under the supervision of an architect to build Nala – son of the greatest architects of all time “Vishwakarma” (Note: “Vishwakarma” is the name given to the greatest archaeologist and architect of the time in ancient Hindu society, a similar practice as we in the modern world’s “Nobel Prize”). Thus, the book ensures that such a bridge by the architects of the highest competence can be built. Why do politicians say mislead the nation that the Lord Rama Superman, the Ramayana bridge when it very clear that this is not Rama, but the architect Nala and Neela, to build the bridge was built? The third bridge was (Ramayana mentions the bridge, built in five days: 14 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 = 100 Yojan) 100 Yojan long and 10 wide Yojan. The data can be found here: The fourth data begins at 14 Yojan as the first day, which is less than the other day, the data are confirmed, a logic that had taken the first day as a start, all fishing gear Vanara. Second day, we had the momentum and the rest of the day, the removal of the bridge will be found that almost the same. A logical conclusion of this sort is made only when the event took place in reality. Why Valmiki put his imagination to get the bridge completed in just 5 days? It would also help to understand the number of days, people of today, it logically. Or he might even have reduced the number of days to highlight the power of Lord Rama. 5e data from more than one crore (10 million) participated in the construction Vanaras be logical, seems to fit, built to support the volume of the bridge. Now, the crowd did not want to be accurate, but surely Valmiki say there is a huge task force works for the bridge. Valmiki could easily show Lord Rama victory in the fight with a few hundred of his soldiers Vanara – Why 10 million? 6th width compared to a relationship at arm also provides scientific support and help, as a large mass of lead on the bridge. The bridge is wide enough to bear the weight of crores Vanaras and allow all to commit to them. The seventh bridge will be built in five days, which was an idea that the bridge in a very short time to be built, otherwise would the enemy king Ravana, had been informed and have never attacked the bridge and will be built. Must adjust the time of the logic of war. The eighth bridge is said about one crore Vanaras be constructed, adjust the number of can do to force the bridge, built in such a short time – a daunting task. Although the method of construction is not ready and the reduction of the word that was different “yantra” or machine used to build the bridge, but there is an indication that the machines have been used to do the job. We must study a subject on our past. Valmiki Ramayana: Yuddha Kanda, 22 60: ”Mahabalah Pashananshch Hastimatran Mahakayah Yantraiyah Samutpatya Parvatanshch Parivahanti Cha ‘ What was the need to mention that some machines for the construction of the bridge were used? How can a man old machines? 9th Very interesting, Rama said the bridge was built, and the point is clear that capacity building was an architect – Nala and not Rama or Hanuman, the hero of the book. Ramayan had been a fantasy of Maharishi Valmiki, he could have easily imagined and wrote something like a bridge of Rama Rama arrows as has been the heroes in the imagination. But this is not because we think it is not in writing fantasy. Why did not he tell the world that Lord Rama, who built and gives credit to another person, it was great? After all, Lord Rama, the hero of his imagination. 10th Ramayana describes the materials used to make clear that the bridge was a possibility, but not to support the capacity of the human imagination in the context of today’s technology. 11 In light of time constraints, he sees logic Vanara who are active in their movement to collect materials and assembly into place as the Government. 12 The places mentioned in the Ramayana exactly where the current bridge, which confirms that the book is not a story. 13 The length of the bridge corresponds to what mentioned in Ramayana. Ramayan may get close but that does not build the bridge is a natural product. Based on the best point of the bridge that Ramayan is not just a book of myth, but a history book, it immediately brings the truth that Maharishi Valmiki, the first historian, the man was known friendly Recent results from the third Ram Sethu and analysis However, we must continue to analyze and present the results. The first thing to take into account the fact that in the context of the current scientific assessment, the bridge is detected, a chain of shoals, is 30-35 km Palk Street and its curvature has only confirmed that it is made by man, and not a geographical concept, everything. Archaeological discoveries have proved that the first signs of human inhabitants in Sri Lanka primitive age of about 1.75 million years come from the same era as Ramayan (Treta Yug, is exactly halfway to the number above). The Sri Lankan government has conducted archaeological research and found some very interesting data: A mountain with medicinal plants of the same species found in the Himalayas covered. There is no other mountain in all of Sri Lanka of its kind this idea is evidence that the mountain of the Lord Hanuman was brought to Sri Lanka – How is it done, subject to study ? To my knowledge, the Hindu Sri Yantra myth (or similar building) is actually an anti-gravity, who know our Rishis in those days and things were possible by such means. The day will probably understand science. Ashok Vatika is drawn with a full Greenery and while the soil. With a distance of 10-20 meters, just suddenly the black soil and burnt, and it extends over miles. This very natural, and it is to prove that Lord Hanuman had burnt Lanka. There are plenty of other evidence which must come, but I think these two points stronger than the bridge itself. see our historians, the British again, and can create more theory on this evidence, so they can be involved in Ramayan cons history books? From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, most places still contain the name, as there are about one million years. Even the disastrous invasion of the Moors could not delete the names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, Rameswaram, Lanka – all names are mentioned in the book. Rameswaram is the place where Lord Rama worshiped Lord Shiva and established the idol of “Shiva lingam,” exist to this day as a place of worship. Mahendragiri Ramayana talks about mountains as the climax and the best place to watch sea Geographically, it is proved that Mahendragiri is the highest mountain in the region and gives a view of the beach about 60 km. Why not tell these politicians and historians, as they are mentioned in Ramayana? Do these places before Valmiki and has traveled extensively to create this story? Or these places were named after people read Valmiki Ramayana? The most logical response is, these places before and allowed the event, which Valimiki have written as a poetic history. Another important issue is fiction Ramayan ‘Pushpak Viman’ – a vehicle that could take the air route of travel. Without doubt, Viman Pusphak no longer exists, but it can not be only the imagination, as we said like to get. What are the challenges the notion of Viman is understood that the technology has evolved in modern times and people were free of these products of high technology in ancient India. But then there is the bottom Pushpak Viman Ramayana in terms of how it was acquired, whereby you think that this is not a mere fantasy. Do not wait for the book of Ramayan, Pushpak Viman details to describe the creation. The question to ask is where the scientific data to develop the construction of Hindu Pushpak Viman lost research – and the true history of India and the world. Have our historians will say that if there was Pushpak Viman then Valmiki would have said how it was built? How many history books today is the scientific method of construction equipment – why not our historians of this first? What seems to be mythical and historians of science, the concept of monkey is the construction of the bridge. But they forget to extend this vision, only because of their biased attitude to overcome Hindu faith. We all know now that there are many species that do not exist now, and the largest dinosaur known to man. Why not, but the species of about 1 million years there with the ability of human intelligence and monkeys as well as the physical structure – as something that was then called Vanara? Science without forgetting that man developed from apes to forget – but defeats to consider Hindus who were to be present in Vanara between the form of the evolution of proof in those days. But would not a glance to see that, because the religion of peace would win then. However, there is no doubt that the theory of evolution is still a controversial theory existing and taught the people, without any scientific proof to him. No historian can deny the fact that there is a chance, and only a coincidence between reality and their presence in a book called Ramayan. Instead, now set a direction for how something like this happened, they are simply followers Catholic use of all forces and theories to falsify reality. The science has to say now that the age of the earth on 4000000000 years – science has produced a story 4000000000 years, with hard evidence – no one asks this question and believes in science. No one knows how many generations developed humanity and destroyed when the Earth was formed. Nobody knows exactly when the Earth was formed. real and fictional stories are on this side also – but our love historians have not the courage to flatter. I do not know if such a construction is not surprising the scope of modern science, why not this bridge is defined as one of the wonders of the world? Why not be listed under the World Heritage (nor do they maintain a sacred Hindu)? Instead, anti-Hindu Congress moves motivate the bridge will be destroyed. If the destruction of Babri Masjid year old 500 is not tolerable and it leads to chaos in the world why buildings million years are not protected? Thousands of Hindu temples were destroyed and are still in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, destroyed, and many other countries. Neither the media nor the policy is to talk about. Why do not Hindus are now Ram Sethu, which is a direct evidence of the ancient history of India to protect millions?

Related posts:

1. Ram Rajaya in India Rajai Ram in India. Dalip Singh Wasan, Advocate. Shri Ram Chandar ji...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.